> About Milli MEP | Milli MEP

About Milli MEP

Engineering led by clear responsibility.

Milli MEP was established to give developers, architects and delivery teams direct access to experienced building-services engineers, backed by rigorous technical governance and clear responsibility at every stage.

MM / COMPANY

Why Milli MEP exists

Projects need clarity before they need more drawings.

Building-services risks often begin with an unresolved spatial constraint, an incomplete brief, missing utility information or unclear responsibility. If these issues remain open, more documentation may make the project look advanced without making it safer to approve, price or build.

MILLI MEP begins by defining the decision, the governing criteria, the responsible parties and the evidence required. The design then progresses through verified calculations, coordinated information and controlled technical review.

OUR TEAM

Meet the people behind MILLI MEP.

Our work brings together technical leadership, commercial awareness and clear client communication.

Anas Yunis, Managing Director at MILLI MEP

Managing Director

Anas Yunis

Anas leads MILLI’s technical direction, bringing more than a decade of international experience in MEP design, coordination and performance-led engineering.

Kristine Akopashvili, Business Development Manager at MILLI MEP

Business Development Manager

Kristine Akopashvili

Kristine leads client relationships, partnerships, proposals and strategic communications at MILLI, connecting client needs with the company’s engineering expertise.

Working principles

The standard applied when the answer is inconvenient.

Principles create value when they control decisions, issue quality and the way project risk is communicated.

01

Technical integrity

Engineering decisions are connected to calculations, design criteria and a recorded review route.

02

Visible responsibility

The client knows who is making the decision, what information it relies on and where responsibility sits.

03

Commercial awareness

Plant space, utility capacity, procurement, programme and operating cost are considered with technical performance.

04

Professional restraint

We state evidence accurately, disclose uncertainty and do not promise outcomes controlled by others.

Engineer-led model

Direct technical responsibility at every stage.

Decision access

Clients work directly with the engineers responsible for technical direction and scope decisions.

Controlled collaboration

Our engineers bring specialist input into the project with explicit interfaces, review duties and deliverables.

Proportionate governance

Our review effort follows the consequences of failure, not a fixed administrative template.

Project enquiry

Work directly with the team accountable for the engineering direction.

Share the project brief, the current technical risk and the next commercial decision. We will establish whether Milli MEP is the right appointment.

Privacy controls